Maybe you haven’t noticed how it is government that has been responsible for most of the massacres in history, or how guns haven’t necessarily played a role in the massacre. There is strong evidence that Sandy Hook was a false flag operation, among other similar massacres, such as the Orlando nightclub shooting, 911, etc. False flag operations, some of which are historical and well documented, aim to achieve a goal, such as justifying increased government surveillance, disarmament of the population, or military action against blamed nations or groups using a variety of concepts, to help sell and publicize; and crises actors are claimed in this context to play the part of bystanders or witnesses, emergency response personnel, and (with the aid of stage makeup) wounded victims of the attack. Take the time to study Sandy Hook and these other similar massacres on your own, and their narratives always follow a similar pattern and purpose. Either the event aims to achieve the objectives of a false flag operation, or false flag operation objectives were achieved. When the objectives are not accomplished, the unlawful use of violence and intimidation against civilians continues, in the pursuit of accomplishing their political aims; this is called terrorism. Every U.S. government change since 9/11, on account of 9/11 inhibits civilian liberty. Top 10 U.S. Government Changes Since 9/11 http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-u-s-government-changes-since-911.php Whether you choose to believe there operate conspirators, a deep state, a tyrant who aims to accomplish these goals, those who aim to hold absolute power will terrorize civilians and always exercise their authority in a cruel and oppressive way, by definition. When the population can NOT see that the purpose of the second amendment is the last resort to protect itself from government tyranny, then those who have lost their life in the name of liberty have died in vain, especially the innocent children who have paid the ultimate sacrifice over whom they grieve. When the population can NOT see that the purpose of the second amendment is the last resort to protect itself from government tyranny, then those who have lost their life in the name of liberty have died in vain, especially the innocent children who have paid the ultimate sacrifice over whom they grieve. Anything legal for government, but illegal for citizenry is tyranny. When government is not restricted by the Constitution, e.g. Second Amendment, or by laws, the population draws closer and closer to control by absolute authority. To pass the right to govern oneself on to government, and not take responsibility for liberty is asking for government tyranny, a condition comparable to that of a slave or despot in respect of exhausting labor and restricted freedom. In his Farewell Address of 1796, Washington warned us about “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.” Government is now pushing its citizens through black propaganda efforts to approve yet another expansion of its authority to capture more individual liberty, besides it right to bear arms, by gunning to question the mental health of individuals based on social media, yet another disturbing example of how government is ready to deploy a social engineering agenda to achieve absolute authority, which certain police officials seek to enforce. According to Framework and methodology for evaluating mental health policy and plans, the importance of monitoring and evaluation of mental health service planning and delivery is indubitable. Notwithstanding, monitoring and evaluation of mental health policy and plans has received only limited attention. Indubitable means impossible to doubt; unquestionable mental health service planning and delivery. Through what recourse in law can a person then report an unlawful detention or imprisonment in a mental hospital to a court? The Suspension Clause of the United States Constitution specifically included the English common law procedure in Article One, Section 9, clause 2, demands that “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” A writ of habeas corpus is used to bring a prisoner or other detainee (e.g. institutionalized mental patient) before the court to determine if the person’s imprisonment or detention is lawful. A habeas petition proceeds as a civil action against the State agent (usually a warden) who holds the defendant in custody. “If you see something, say something” was one of the main tasks of the “Staatssicherheit” AKA Stasi, one of the most hated and feared institutions of East German communist government, SPYING on the population, mainly through a vast network of citizens turned informants, and fighting any opposition by overt and covert measures, including hidden PSYCHOLOGICAL destruction of dissidents. History clearly shows that government seeks the ABSOLUTE subordination of the individual, and its citizenry pays in the form of false flag massacres or through other tyrannical measures for its liberty. We stand in the danger of losing all our liberties, and once lost, only blood will bring them back.
March 26, 2018